The biggest panorama I ever stitched:
It just looks nice in the original version on flickr, but be aware that it is 25268 px × 1000 px!
So some statistics
I did stitch it to the end just as a test what's feasible actually:
- 90 shots (maybe 88 used here) at 83mm focal length
- final cropped panorama is 77624 px × 3072 px
- stitched using hugin with the nona engine, blended with enblend
- nona did take about 3 hours (this just morphs the images), but blending them using enblend did take about 3 days (!)
- in the first run of nona I did forget to activate LZW compression for the tifs created by nona, so each one was about 1.2 GB and my hard disk was filled up, with LZW it's just about 24 MB per pic as there're big transparent areas
- the final LZW compressed tif is about 600 MB, loaded in Gimp to crop, Gimp needs about 3.5 GB
- the uploaded scaled down JPEG version just is about 2.5 MB
Conclusion
So is it feasible?No! Just a test and next time I'll use a smaller focal length... The problem is not only the stitching time, but it's hard to work with these many images in hugin (and I assume in any other stitching program). Because of that this stitch isn't perfect by far (usually I'd have defined more vertical and horizontal lines), but I don't care for this one.
Another problem with this big panorama is that you can't view it in a nice way completely anyway. You just can look at parts or all the details will be lost. Considering all this I won't do something alike soon eventually.
Now you can call me crazy, Dirk! ;-)

